Orthopedic implants specialist state that functional bracing of diaphyseal humeral fractures have been proved satisfactory in most clinical cases. The results are as expected and the recovery in such cases is very satisfactory. The ortho surgical implants technology applied in such cases is simple and the follow-up protocol is unfussy and easy to adhere to.
As the top orthopedic products manufacturers in India, we have conducted our separate analysis. The study found out that the anatomical restoration of the fractured bone is seldom attainable with functional braces. But it must be also understood that the slight anatomical variations that are often encountered in the above cases are not functionally harmful and the external appearance of the extremities is usually up to standard. Hence, such methods are often preferred in the orthopedic surgical instrument’s domain.
Let us consider another case of diaphyseal fractures in which surgery is performed in order to avoid a residual mild angulation. In these cases, open reduction and internal fixation of diaphyseal humeral fractures are intricate to justify as this surgery would not produce an easily recognizable deformity and no associated functional impairment. Our experienced orthopaedic implants and instruments experts believe that the surgical treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures becomes the treatment of choice in cases where closed treatment prevents satisfactory functional management. This is found generally in the case of the patient who has been subjected to multiple traumatic injuries and is unable to assume the upright position or carry out the day to day activities with ease. The same is true for open fractures with significant soft tissue damage (tissues that attach, hold up, or surround other structures and organs of the body).
Our other orthopedic instruments study with around thousands of diaphyseal humeral fractures cured with functional braces has shown that even the comminuted type fractures (break or fall apart of the bone into more than two fragments) of distal third are feasible for functional bracing treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. It has also been found out that the initial angular deformity and fragmental separation of the rectus abdominis muscles are corrected spontaneously and further this correction is easily maintained.
Orthopedic implants suppliers believe that comminuted fractures are easier to treat than the fractures in which bone break at a right angle to the long plane of the bone that occur when a strong force is applied perpendicular to the long axis of a bone. This happens because in the former group angular deformity is more easily prevented and corrected.
This latter type of fractures also called Transverse fractures, particularly if nondisplaced, are more likely to encounter angular deformities.
Medical specialists at our orthopedic implant company also clarify the fact that the presence of an associated radial nerve palsy which develops at the time of the injury does not prevent the use of orthopedic instruments such as the braces. It was also found that the surgical examination of these associated nerves under the above-mentioned circumstances is rarely indicated as spontaneous nerve function takes place in most cases. However, a detailed examination of the nerve is indicated in the cases of open fracture and in those instances when the neurological discrepancy develops at a later state, suggesting progressive lock-in of the nerve in the healing callus.
We have also seen that the development of arrest in the fracture repair process from functional bracing of diaphyseal humeral fractures is low and the complications from trauma implants surgery, which often are difficult to conquer, are completely eradicated.
We would like to conclude on the note that closed functional bracing of secluded humeral fractures (break of the humerus bone in the upper arm) does not require any admittance in the hospital, and therefore, the cost of medical care is appreciably reduced. Also, physical therapy is not essential in most instances, since day to day exercises without any supervision carried out by the orthopedic implants patient are all that is desirable to prevent deformities, retrenchments, muscle weakening, and permanent deformation.
